The much-anticipated film “Animal,” featuring Ranbir Kapoor, has stirred up a maelstrom of controversy and disappointment among audiences. While some applaud Ranbir Kapoor’s acting prowess, the majority contend that the film falls flat in various aspects, from its storyline to the portrayal of characters, leading to widespread accusations of fake reviews.
The Alleged Discrepancy in Reviews
Numerous critics have showered the film with five-star and four-star reviews, prompting skepticism among viewers. A prevalent narrative asserts that these positive reviews are not genuine critiques but rather the result of paid promotions orchestrated by the movie’s production team. This article delves into the discontent expressed by disappointed viewers, exploring their grievances and questioning the authenticity of the film’s purported critical acclaim.
The Storyline Critique
“Animal” is lambasted for its convoluted and stretched storyline, clocking in at almost four hours. Critics argue that the plot appears to be a desperate cry for attention from the protagonist’s billionaire father, leaving audiences questioning the rationale behind such a narrative. The director, Sandeep Vanga, known for his previous success with “Kabir Singh,” is criticized for failing to replicate that triumph and instead delivering a storyline lacking direction and purpose.
Misogyny and Objectification
A recurring criticism revolves around the alleged misogynistic undertones of the film. From illogical plot points to poorly developed characters, the movie is accused of showing no respect towards women. Scenes depicting violence against women and portraying them as mere sexual objects have fueled discontent among viewers. The director’s track record with misogyny in previous works, such as “Kabir Singh,” further exacerbates these concerns.
Ranbir Kapoor’s Struggles
While Ranbir Kapoor is acknowledged as a charismatic and versatile performer, his efforts to salvage the film are hindered by a poorly developed script. The protagonist’s conflicted character fails to establish a connection with the audience, leaving Kapoor’s performance overshadowed by the film’s broader shortcomings.
Cinematic Misstep and Inconsistencies
Critics argue that “Animal” unfortunately devolves into a hodgepodge of clichés and inconsistencies. The screenplay, laden with melodramatic dialogues and predictable twists, lacks the subtlety and nuance necessary for a film of this nature. Supporting actors, Rashmika and Anil Kapoor, are deemed “okish,” failing to showcase their talents due to the pitfalls of a poorly executed script and direction.
Unveiling the Alleged Paid Reviews
The discontented audience alleges that the positive reviews circulating online are a result of paid promotions orchestrated by the film’s producer’s PR company. Viewers express sympathy for those who succumbed to the temptation of monetary compensation, ultimately contributing to what they describe as a cinematic catastrophe.
“All five and four-star reviews are paid and fake posted by the ‘Animal’ movie producer’s PR company…ignore them and save your money.” – Disgruntled Viewer
Conclusion
As “Animal” continues to elicit mixed reviews, it becomes imperative to sift through the discontent and accusations of fake reviews. The film’s alleged missteps, coupled with concerns over misogyny and inconsistencies, underscore the need for a critical reevaluation of its merits. Audiences are urged to approach the film with caution and make informed decisions, mindful of the possibility of biased or paid reviews influencing their perceptions.
Invest your time in a more deserving piece of storytelling, and save yourself from this cinematic catastrophe.
Disclaimer: This review is an analysis of the existing criticism surrounding the film “Animal” and does not represent the personal opinion of the author.
